|
Terrorism, Racism, and Elder Abuse
Interfering in the lifestyles of senior citizens by terrorizing them has become endemic and a common practice in many nursing homes. This ranks even more seriously when neo-fascist landlords classify tenants living in independent-living apartment blocks as vulnerable adults then terrorize them to control them politically [Homicide by Abuse].
Council House (Seattle) tenants do not require supervision and live independently as do tenants in any apartment block. The only difference relates to age and government subsidy. In effect, the law protects that category of people more than others from landlord abuse. Yet, the directors and their representatives wilfully abuse tenants by misusing supervisory rules that apply only to residents of nursing homes for vulnerable people (people declared incompetent) not to tenants of apartment blocks for independent living.
For senior citizen tenants who insist upon their civil and human rights, life becomes a living hell when sociopathic managers subject them to humiliation and abuse. Council House managers employ thugs and an elite to provoke incidents among tenants and to file false complaints of violence.
Maniacal administrators think nothing of waging an insane, evil war against people they do not like or with whom they do not agree. They retaliate against people who complain about unlawful and sometimes insane activities to government oversight agencies. [Elder Abuse - Preface]
Managers base their actions upon transference or projection which classifies not only as illegal but also as immoral. Stephen (aka Stefan and by several other aliases) A. Mitchell has now ludicrously introduced “sensitivity training” for staff probably to try to correct his own emotional problems that he has projected onto others. [Five Kapos]
Mitchell deals with his own emotional conflict (internal or external stresses) by falsely attributing to tenants his own unacceptable feelings, impulses, or thoughts through projection, transference, and totalitarian control. This manifests in a pattern or practice of retaliating against tenants in violation of their civil and constitutional rights then evicting them when they complain to government agencies.
He remains perfectly aware of his own affects or impulses then deliberately misinterprets them as justifiable reaction to other people. An out-of-work actor, he uses his thespian skills to choreograph and project his own sociopathic traits onto others which makes it difficult to know who did what to whom first.
Media remains the only effective voice to detail retaliatory action taken against senior citizens for reporting crimes. However, in Seattle the mainstream press has consistently failed to perform that duty. Instead, it has consistently attacked reporters of elder abuse to maintain a politically correct stance with the abusers. [Evil, Anonymity, and Social Tyranny - Political Correctness]
Council House managers do not provide reasons for their discriminatory actions and retaliation against tenants for reporting wrongdoing. The government agencies concerned (US Department of Housing and Urban Development and City of Seattle) collude with housing managers to defuse the situation which effectively permits further abuse and grants wrongdoers impunity.
John W. Meyers, Regional Director, HUD; Thomas A. Carr, Seattle City Attorney; and, Norm Maleng, King County Prosecuting Attorney; among others, have received reports about hundreds of complaints by Council House tenants yet neglect to act on virtually all of them including those that allege homicide. They must eventually prosecute to stop the brutalization of elderly tenants. [Elder Abuse - Introduction]
Reports filed with government agencies by tenants and retaliation by the agency or the person subject to the complaint have caused an aura of fear that makes others leery of filing grievances. The oversight agencies must begin to grant immunity to people who report crimes and protect them from retaliation and further abuse. They must not bury formal complaints and collude with blackmailers by pandering to an elite. [Agency Accountability]
The premise that one must adhere to the dictates of members of a special interest group by co-signing everything that the leaders believe or think cannot prevail in a democracy. Living among Jews does not mean that individuals must accept their religious doctrines and jingoistic aspirations let alone their corporate dalliance in addressing issues. That neo-fascist mentality can only perpetuate the communal violence and racism that Council House managers have actively promoted, and in many cases fabricated, as an excuse for evicting and jailing non-Jewish dissenters.
Religions aligned with Abraham - Judaism, Christianity and Islam - remain exclusionary. One cannot claim to subscribe to any combination of their doctrines although non-Christians recognize the existence of Jesus as a prophet. At Council House, Judaism ranks as the only true religion (contrary to law) and any use of the name Jesus brings retaliation.
In one of her many exclusionary acts, Audrey F. Dunbar (Mitchell’s assistant) insisted that predominantly black gospel singers refrain from using the name Jesus (or songs of Christian relevance) during their performance at Council House. She said that she found reference to Jesus offensive to Jewish residents. She prohibits mentioning Jesus - a Jew albeit a dissenter and arguably black - from any discourse in government-subsidized housing. Did Dunbar, by her bigoted statement, disqualify herself forever from employment in a multicultural environment? [Trials of Leon Harris]
Leaders within almost all religions try to eliminate the separation between church and state then coerce individuals to relinquish their secular power. Catholics have for many years used this approach through Opus Dei - reportedly a secretive authoritarian organization that borders upon religious cultism, It links to right-wing political organizations worldwide - one of the dictatorial paths currently followed by US government.
Opus Dei mainly recruits students from prestigious universities then persuades them to enter professions and institutions where they can influence public policy from a fascist perspective. Similarly, Council House directors have infiltrated several corporations, institutions, and the judiciary, to further religious and Zionist aspirations at the expense of free speech and the rights of others.
Jewish hypocrisy finally surfaces when Jews applaud proponents of free speech who criticize other religions and sectarian interests then evict and jail reporters for exposing corrupt Jews. They arbitrarily classify the latter genre as anti-Semitic hate speech and harassment of their own special interest group.
One must ask how anyone can harass a group by writing about them when individuals have a right not to read anything that they find unpalatable. Moreover, harassment applies only to tormenting an individual - frequently practiced by Council House managers - not dissent among religious or political groups and those who write about them.
Harassment laws certainly do not allow abrogation of the rights of journalists who write about religious or political groups. In fact, most laws specifically preclude using them to silence writers. The notion of special interest groups filing antiharassment suits with courts, also complaints to Anti-Defamation League (ADL), ranks as patently absurd when those lawsuits and complaints apply to constitutionally protected speech. [Supreme Court Petition]
ADL Law Enforcement Update regularly publishes articles containing opposing views. This month (17 Dec 04) it addresses issues related to Holocaust denial and extremism. The editors show balance by allowing opposing views which encourages readers to form their own opinion. They even provided space for an article about Arthur Butz who repeatedly denies the Holocaust and have also given coverage to many other extremists. However, they neglect to report similar practices within the Jewish establishment.
Freedom of speech permits publication of truth without interference from other people or acceptance of their moral or political ideologies. Journalists have ethical and moral responsibilities. Ethically, they must speak out even when very few people will listen. Morally they must stand their ground when attacked by those who would silence them. That calls for a strong and independent psyche predicated upon reasoned thought and feelings not on political affiliation. [Conspiracy of Silence]
In a democracy, the right to offend becomes far more important than any claim to protection from feeling offended. If one believes in free speech then one supports it for those whose views one opposes as well as the views one finds acceptable.
People indoctrinated by politically correct gurus make statements with great care not to offend anyone. They censor themselves. If this means denying the truth then they outright lie or propagandize. In present politically correct environments, pointing out the violent aspects of Islam defines as free speech but pointing out the violent aspects of Christian fundamentalism defines as blasphemy or, in a neo-fascist or secular sense, sedition.
Council House directors employ a neo-fascist administrator and allow him to terrorize their tenants with his bigoted and illegal zero-tolerance and censorship policies. Recently, that abuse has gained momentum in an organized campaign against black tenants. The more his sociopathic traits surface the more his terrorism and racism becomes apparent. [Evil, Anonymity, and Social Tyranny - Social Tyranny]
Contra Cabal exposed the directors (2000) for an exclusionary rental policy that precluded black people from applying for jobs or renting apartments at Council House. The report criticized lack of advertising for a replacement administrator contrary to HUD mandates. The article apparently prodded Bradley K. Spear (a Council House director/lawyer) to place advertisements in The Jewish Transcript. The editor then questioned how many non-Jews read that paper and would reply to an advertisement with racially-biased content.
As a lawyer, Spear knew that he must follow the letter also the spirit of the law yet he failed to mitigate the damage. He did not advertise the position in national, non-sectarian publications. That neglect will probably result in him appearing before a civil rights commission and a bar association disciplinary committee. He must also face prosecution for the perjury that he committed to place the reporter that exposed him in solitary confinement. [Ethnic Discrimination]
HUD read Contra Cabal articles sent to them by the editor then ordered Mitchell to advertise in ethnic newspapers. He grudgingly complied. Several blacks applied and qualified for residency. However, a recent appellate court finding (apparently bought and paid for by the directors) implicitly affirmed a trail court decision that condoned racist behavior.
The impunity and anonymity provided by both courts has caused Mitchell to increase tenant coercion using an “ethnic cleansing” approach to constructive eviction of blacks. The latest purge paradoxically paralleled the propaganda that he created for sensitivity training courses. This has started a return by Council House to its previous ethnic imbalance with a systematic campaign against blacks (some of them with life-threatening illnesses). [Elder Abuse Case Studies]
The administrator (Stephen Mitchell), hides behind an unconstitutional screen of court-ordered impunity and anonymity arranged for him by a vicious and corrupt board of directors. For his silence about their unlawful activities and to support his elder abuse, the directors made him a director and now pay him about $60,000.00/pa in addition to the income from myriad theatrical activities that he runs on Council House time.
In contrast, his only income prior to joining Council House came from itinerant acting parts in fringe theater and associated activities. Mitchell has virtually no managerial or mental health qualifications and exhibits gross incompetence which he covers up with cruelty and pathological lying. He has misled the media, misled the public, misled the courts (perjury), and deliberately lied to his tenants and directors about the egregious elder abuse that continues to occur under his direction. [Thespian Liar]
Using propaganda, Mitchell lied to tenants about legal fees that he has incurred in a court action originally brought against him for harassing a tenant. He tells them that the fees have reached $20,000 and that tenants will have to pay increased rents to cover them - an impermissible rent increase under HUD regulations.
By that, Mitchell hides the fact that the legal fees related to that case - caused by his incompetence, perjury, and elder abuse - will probably reach at least $200,000 before courts settle everything. This figure does not include actual damages, compensation for intentional tort, fines for criminal activity, and proposed class action and civil rights lawsuits.
Mitchell will probably go to jail for his criminal acts which include multiple perjury and alleged homicide. Lynn, wife of Judge Anthony P. Wartnik, and Sheila, wife of Seattle attorney Craig S. Sternberg (both Council House directors) will have to accept full responsibility for the token goy-toy-boy they employed. These bimbos must admit to knowingly filing a false federal document - with full knowledge of Mitchell’s lack of qualifications - in order to gain HUD employment ratification. Moreover, the directors will have to assume joint and several liability for his malfeasance as well as pay for their own culpability and criminal activity. [Supreme Court - Petition for Review]
Tyranny will continue at Council House until its directors offer alternatives and stop using this non-profit corporation as a cash cow. A high proportion of tenants believe that the directors need to clean house by employing a completely new team of qualified administrators that possesses both morals and ethics. The directors must also evict the people they employ as kapos who receive wages and/or benefits in kind.
American law does not distinguish between principals or their agents in the commission of unlawful acts. It holds directors liable for their own acts also acts by their agents. Consequently, when directors employ people they remain jointly and severally liable for any willful or negligent damage to third parties. Directors may neither claim ignorance of wrongdoing by their employees and agents nor remain unaccountable and anonymous.
The way to oppose prejudice and oppression lies in exposing it then countering its absurd generalizations by presenting relevant evidence - something the all-Jewish Council House board of directors fails to comprehend. Instead, they try to kill the messenger.
In a true democracy, authors who denounce illegal acts or discredit illegal actors - both issues of public interest - do not expect courts to arbitrarily silence them and send them to jail. Disagreement can only reach consensus through rational and logical discourse and must not degenerate into ad hominem by incompetent judges who, in Seattle, rank as the garbage of the legal process. [Bimbo Bingo] [Judicial Misconduct and the Law]
[Nmesis]
|
