|
Thespian Liar's Liars
Lying to get someone else into trouble, or to embarrass them, ranks as despicable and morally indefensible. Lying to get someone jailed for offenses they did not commit ranks as legally indefensible. Lying in a judicial proceeding ranks as criminal. Suborning perjury by procuring others to lie under an oath with the sole intent of jailing someone else, ranks even more grievously.
[Perjury and Subornation]
Writing in a satirical genre requires the writer to become completely vulnerable. Jonathan Swift claimed that people see a reflection of everybody’s face but their own in satirical portrayal - that writing offends only those who recognize themselves. Many writers cannot expose themselves through insecurity and fear of retribution if they use their First Amendment rights to state their opinion publicly. Political silence then allows absolute control by those who have power over those who have none.
Journalists often endanger themselves when they expose malfeasance by powerful people who belong to societal elites. These groups also often have a powerful influence over those who control the media. Moreover, investigative reporters frequently find themselves abandoned when politically correct peers, worried about their jobs, avert their eyes in wilful blindness and even vilify them publicly.
Publishing names and addresses insures accuracy especially when dealing with wrongdoers having a common name. Shame naming and blaming causes some individuals to stop breaking the law because they fear the economic and legal consequences of exposure. Moreover, mitigation protects the public and opens communication. Courts have repeatedly found publishing names, addresses, telephone numbers, and ages as both legal and constitutional. This now includes web site content that has similar rules to other publications.
[Shame Naming and Blaming]
|
|
|
 |
Felippe Jacques (72±) and fifteen willing residents held a meeting (24 Dec 00) in his apartment with the sole intent of spreading hate and suborning testimony. That meeting not only violated federal law but reached a contemptible level of human experience. The participants opened a Pandora’s box that they cannot close. The box contained hate and bigotry that spread like a plague. They brought evil to bear upon other residents in an aura of declared misanthropy (hate of other human beings).
The residents who organized the frame-up conspired to incriminate an individual using false pretenses. They perjured themselves and they all deserve long jail sentences. The plotting at that meeting has now developed into an issue of worldwide concern. That concern has continued for several years resulting in a Washington Supreme Court review because it affects so many people professionally and economically.
Mitchell, Dunbar, and Jacques suborned forty declarations from tenants in an attempt to stop exposure of their criminal activity and elder abuse (19 Apr 01). This situation arises when trial judges and appellate courts make politically motivated decisions instead of interpreting law.
Six of the eight witnesses who offered testimony against Lauren Jeanne Hawk (30 Jun 05) previously filed perjured declarations against other Council House tenants. Directors and their thugs have consistently suborned a tenant elite since 2001. In addition, six directors committed perjury which they used to pervert justice. Mitchell also tampered with each of the tenant witnesses for the petitioner in the 2001 case now before Washington Supreme Court. He either unlawfully evicted them, tried to bribe them, or had his Kapos seriously harass them. [Supreme Court Review] [Hawk and the Raven]
In Washington state, perjury by signing misleading declarations or giving false testimony classifies as a class B felony which carries a maximum punishment of ten years in a correctional institution, and/or a $20,000 fine, on each count. Corrupt judges have repeatedly disallowed discovery and cross-examination that would have exposed those crimes: instead, they granted Council House directors impunity. [Impunity]
Mitchell has now reached his thespian pinnacle by lying to a superior court judge which will probably result in his receiving a taste of his own medicine in jail. He can experience first hand what black home boys feel about corrupt honky actors. He can experience real sublimation when inmates modify their instinctual impulses in ways acceptable to jail society. [Thespian Liar]
Mitchell will learn to understand inmate preoccupation with, and enjoyment of, effeminate thespians. He will bear the brunt of prisoner disgust for people who make false charges with malicious intent by attacking the good name and reputation of others - especially when they learn that he has racially discriminated against black people. They will delight in tormenting him as he has tormented others for his abuse of innocent people whom he had arrested and incarcerated by scripting frame-ups and writing false reports.
During the coming months, a series of abstracts will expose the more than forty people who took part and supported Thespian Liar’s years of subterfuge and elder abuse. Mitchell, his thugs, and his elite, must all now take responsibility and account for their actions in the courts. Meanwhile, participating Council House residents who have a modicum of decency and moral responsibility should probably try to extricate themselves from this situation before it overtakes them.
These abstracts and comments continue to follow the policy of answering language with more language, always followed by the author for the public good in contrast to multiple perjury, violence, and elder abuse promoted by Stephen A. Mitchell (40), Audrey F. Dunbar (35), Felippe Jacques (72±), Council House directors, generally, and the corrupt judges that they support - projected by several rabid reporters in attempts to curry favor with them.
Censored versions of the six pamphlets subject to the Supreme Court review comprise the sum total of the complaint of harassment. No violence or shouting ever occurred (apart from a vociferous call to order under Roberts’ Rules to avoid a racially motived argument). All investigation for these articles conformed with the ethical standards accepted by reporters and as described within the articles. Readers must decide for themselves whether they consider that the content of these articles, all constitutionally protected, warranted such Draconian measures.
Mitchell, Dunbar, and Jacques suborned forty declarations from tenants in an attempt to stop exposure of their criminal activity and elder abuse (19 Apr 01). This situation arises when trial judges and appellate courts make politically motivated decisions instead of interpreting law.
Council House Crones and their Cronies
Audrey F. Dunbar (35). Since publication of an article (20 Jun 05) about the suicide of a Council House tenant, City of Seattle officials have become the most avid readers of Contra Cabal. They have hit the site several thousand times a day - the highest number from one identifiable source for June 02. The site had a total of 155,645/hits that month and 1,072,222/hits during the preceding twelve months. It appears that City of Seattle has finally taken an interest in Dunbar’s involvement in the death of her aunt.
[Abstract - Who Killed Jackie Nations?] [Text - Who Killed Jackie Nations?] [Statistics (Hits/Month)]
Richard Roesler, a reporter for The Spokesman-Review (Spokane, Washington), has recycled a perjured declaration filed by Dunbar four years ago. He knew that the trial judge had refused discovery and cross-examination.
Discovery, a compulsory process, allows pretrial disclosure and enables litigants to elicit and question facts presented in a case. Roesler published excerpts without questioning the other party or fact-checking the information.
Roesler also knew that lawyers have repeatedly questioned the validity of more than forty allegedly suborned declarations filed at the same time, yet he excerpted and published quotations from them. Then he ignored affidavits containing contrasting opinion filed by the opposing party - completely irresponsible behavior for a journalist
Roesler published his libelous news article following a Supreme Court hearing. It contrasted an article by Associated Press reporter, Rachel La Corte, in Seattle Post-Intelligencer (23 Jun 05). He continued the practice of some Washington media and judges in adopting kill-the-messenger techniques. Roesler's managing editor has received a complaint but has not yet responded.
Roesler resuscitated an outstanding libel complaint against a fellow hack reporter, Michael Roarke, who published the original story and went on a talk show to press his point. David Oglesby, Publisher and Editor, and David McCumber, Managing Editor, Seattle Post-Intelligencer have still not addressed those issues. Several professional journalism associations have colluded with them by also publishing libel.
In court testimony (02 Apr 01), Dunbar wrote:
I feel uncomfortable that Mr. Trummel has attempted to research my background that does not relate to my work, for example; contacting the coroners office after my aunt had passed away to obtain information on her death, researching the sale of my previous home and the purchase of my present home.
Nothing wrong with her feeling that way - anyone who had complicity in alleged homicide by abuse would feel the same way when an investigative reporter started to inquire into the victim’s death. [Who Killed Jackie Nations?]
I personally never met Grace Burton, a four-foot-something member of Mitchell’s pandering elite. I neither spoke with her nor harassed her on her deathbed as Dunbar testified. To support her perjury, Dunbar played a time-warp game and completely misrepresented published fact.
I listened to Burton rant and rave at a public meeting that Mitchell convened and legally recorded what she said. After that meeting, I looked into her background to find that she belonged to an elite run by Mitchell and Dunbar to harass tenants.
The background check showed that her own family had outlawed her because of her abrasive behavior and the majority of Council House tenants treated her as a pariah. Grace Burton in her whole life probably never earned a sweetness and light compliment.
The statement: "Burton evaded police charges by using her imminent move to a much warmer clime as an excuse" for filing false charges with police (published after her demise) represented fair ironic comment. The reference to “pandering pygmy” (constitutionally protected comment) appeared in a subsequent article. I did not articulate either comment before or after her demise. [The Mullen Legacy]
Felippe Jacques wrote the minutes of the meeting (25 Dec 00) that he held in his apartment. They contain the following statement which confirms my own perception of Burton:
There were twelve women and two men present. One black male, one black female. Of the twelve others, only five were Jewish. . . They all (at least those who knew her) said that Bess was a bitch and Grace Burton an arrogant bore.
The problem, which has now blossomed into an international outrage and a Supreme Court review, started with an article about nocturnal noise which I submitted for publication in a house organ that Burton published. In consort with Dunbar, Burton changed the contextual meaning of that article and published it over my byline without reference to me. I complained about it in a letter to her then published the truth in my own newsletter and distributed it in accordance with Seattle municipal ordinances.
[Letter - PT-00-0215-0953] [Life In a Seattle Squirrel Cage]
Mark T. Mullen, administrator, had for more than a year ignored complaints about people playing radios and TV at all hours of the night and making other noises that disturbed the sleep of many tenants. After I published the article, Mullen publicly humiliated me in the lobby then held a meeting (17 May 00) of his elite and some other residents in the form of a kangaroo court.
Mullen and Grace Burton proceeded to incite residents to violence by calling for peer pressure to ostracize other residents. I openly tape recorded the proceedings. The sixty-minute tape contains about thirty minutes during which Burton shilled for Mullen to help him achieve his objective.
I immediately experienced the results of that incitement. Some residents known for their violence in the past decided to use the situation to provoke and violently to threaten other residents. By his statements, Mullen declared open season upon me and anyone seen talking to me.
In a letter to Donald R. S-lverm-n (later president of Council House), I outlined the problems and informed him that if they did not receive board attention then I would publish the details and obtain a restraining order. I sent copies to Bradley Spear (a director and attorney) and Richard R. Beresford (Council House attorney). They did not respond. [Letter - PT-00-0519-0940]
Later, Spear and four other directors (Victor DeLeon - now president, Paul M-lak-ff, Edward F. Stern, and Lynn C. Wartnik - wife of Judge Anthony P. Wartnik) wrote perjured declarations to have me transferred from general population in King County Jail (where they had previously incarcerated me) to solitary confinement, all without due process of law.
[Rampant Judicial Delusion]
Several days after publishing the article and Mullen's meeting, I had a visit from two officers from Seattle Police Department (SPD) who said that they had received a harassment complaint filed by Grace Burton, Mary Lou Saul, and her husband Duneer Saul (now deceased). In court testimony Dunbar admits to knowledge of that visit.
[Life In a Seattle Squirrel Cage]
The officers claimed that Burton, et al, said that they felt intimidated by my newsletter and viewed its content as harassment. The officers seated themselves in my apartment, then I gave them a short talk on the First Amendment, Washington State laws, and Seattle City Municipal Code relating to distribution of printed materials in apartment blocks. They read the newsletter and the law then found the complaint frivolous. They left bemused and confused. [Prohibited Acts by Owners]
I later discovered that Mitchell had orchestrated the police complaint in consort with Dunbar in an attempt to stop publication of the newsletter - the first in a long trail of harassing acts involving false complaints to SPD that they used to intimidate tenants. I wrote to him (16 Jun 00):
The board of directors and their managers have apparently encouraged this type of behavior by not enforcing HUD directives and complying with state law. Stahl, the Sauls, and Burton, have now escalated administrative dereliction into criminal activity: namely libel and conspiracy to file false reports with the Seattle Police Department. [Letter - 00-0616-1010]
SPD now silently withholds the records which effectively grants Mitchell and Dunbar impunity. [Silent Withholding] [Impunity]
Dunbar’s perjured testimony now forms part of the record under review by Washington Supreme Court. Roesler, republished that testimony knowing of its dubious nature. That defines as malicious libel. Instead of researching the matter or questioning the author - with knowledge that the author had not received due process and the right to cross-examine Dunbar - Roesler published it anyway:
According to court documents, one of his newsletters called one neighbor - on her deathbed - a "pandering pygmy.". . . When indignant residents told him to leave the dying woman alone, he allegedly responded with a follow-up article predicting that she would soon be going to "a much warmer climate." The Spokesman-Review (24 Jun 05)
Roesler went on a hysterical rampage and did not read the published facts. Instead, he relied upon perjured testimony without giving the subject a chance to refute the statements. Then he published libel.
His copy bears no relation to Dunbar’s perjured testimony or to the truth. As a notary public, she manufactured and swore completely false statements for political purposes in a consort with her employer Stephen A. Mitchell. She testified:
I personally witnessed him [Nmesis] harassing Grace Burton, a former resident, now deceased, on her deathbed, by calling her names such as pandering pygmy. When confronted that she was dying and in hospice, he replied that he did not believe that and continued harassing her by writing about her in his newsletters and even going so far as saying she would be going to a much warmer climate (hell). Grace was extremely distraught through the end. She made a police report of his harassment.
I never met or had contact with Burton and avoided the belligerent Duneer Saul and his wife after Duneer assaulted me in the Council House lobby. In his usual way, Mitchell tried to turn that around to make me the aggressor. In her absence, Dunbar witnessed nothing yet she wrote into testimony:
I have witnessed him harassing Mary Lou Saul, by continuing to attack her with letters and through his newsletters because she was secretary of the residents association. She also filed a police report regarding this harassment.
I have witnessed Mr. Trummel verbally attacking Danny Saul in the lobby of Council House in front of many residents and his wife Mary Lou Saul. [Declaration (02 Jun 01)]
Dunbar, a prolific perjurer, used the following report (published by me in a newsletter after Burton’s death) to write her perjury. She rewrote the copy using a time-warp strategy then swore and filed it as “evidence”.
False Police Report. Mary Lou Saul, her husband Duneer, and Grace Burton, contacted the Seattle Police Department and falsely claimed harassment. They tried to suppress freedom of expression by a resident journalist who holds an international press card. Moreover, they did this despite an attorney telling them not to break the law. They violated the First Amendment to the US Constitution. Subsequently, they conspired to file a false police report violating both state and federal laws. They could face severe civil and criminal penalties. Burton evaded police charges by using her imminent move to a much warmer clime as an excuse. The residents' council must rid itself of its secretary, Mary Lou Saul, who, apart from conspiring to file the false police report, has kept inadequate meeting minutes and refuses to give residents copies of them. In addition, she has administered fraudulent elections arbitrarily to appoint residents' council officers contrary to HUD directives. [Disconnected Abstracts]
Dunbar witnessed nothing yet wrote declarations, then appeared as a witness for Mitchell, so that he could incarcerate other tenants, particularly JoRene Dodson (75). [Contractor’s Daughter]
Supreme Court justices questioned why Judge James A. Doerty refused to allow cross-examination and discovery. The court also has under review the multiple perjury concocted by Mitchell, Dunbar, and Jacques. The three of them will deserve long jail sentences when justice eventually prevails. Perhaps Roesler and Roarke would care to join them.
Jeanette Pruett (84). Pruett received several editions of a legitimately published pamphlet distributed in accordance with Seattle municipal ordinances. The president of the residents’ association, Nathaniel Stahl, advised tenants that if they did not want to receive the publication then they could request removal of their name from the list. Six people out of about 160 requested removal of their names. They did not receive any more editions. Many residents complimented the author on exposing the elder abuse at Council House. [Prohibited Acts by Owners]
Pruett did not request removal of her name; instead, she chose to collaborate with Mitchell and his thugs in a campaign of harassment against the author/publisher by filing perjured declarations about the constitutionally protected content of his publication. With others, she had him constructively evicted for legally distributing the newsletter then sent to jail for publishing similar material on the Internet.
Not content with that, about a year later she filed another perjured declaration that helped Mitchell move the author to solitary confinement. Still not content, she lied to an Associated Press reporter at the Supreme Court while the justices reviewed her previous perjury and Mitchell’s unlawful activities.
As slaves of the Thespian Liar, the Council House crones bear his brand. They endure searing by fire and believe that the eventual benefits in kind far outweigh the psychological pain. One sometimes muses about the wisdom of the law that does not allow burning witches at the stake.
Ages shown as at 28 May 05 and deceased persons as at death.
[Nmesis]
|
