Dereliction and Collusion - City of Seattle

Alleged Dereliction and Unlawful Collusion among
Thomas A. Carr, Seattle City Attorney,
his assistants Michael J. Finkle, Robert W. Hood, and
T. Sean Sheehan (an apologist for Mayor Greg Nickels),
in consort with
Stephen A. Mitchell, Council House directors, and their lawyers.

Seattle Jewish Mafia (SJM), a faith-based initiative similar to Al Quaeda, has destroyed Contra Cabal web site three times. It attempted to silence the author and to cover up elder abuse by Council House directors using unlawful means to prevent constitutionally protected speech. [Seattle Jewish Mafia] [The Mob] [Kill the Messenger - WIP]

With similar intent, Seattle City Attorney Thomas A. Carr, has issued six criminal indictments against the author. He has attempted to intimidate, silence, and return the author to jail on trumped-up charges - charges similar to those used by Judge James A. Doerty to jail and place him in solitary confinement (27 Feb 02).

Washington Supreme Court reversed both the trial court finding (Doerty) and the appellate court affirmation (Becker) (30 Mar 06). [Washington Supreme Court - Decision]

Carr’s behavior, as an elected official, ranks as truly kafkaesque. In an attempt to preempt the Supreme Court decision, he has evidently tried to pervert the course of justice. Fabricating or interfering with evidence and threatening or intimidating witnesses both classify as criminal offenses punishable by a jail sentence.

SJM has shown a pattern of racketeering (defined by the Civil Rights Act and RICO statute). A RICO pattern means two or more organized criminal acts which indicate ensuant activity. Those acts include conspiracy to commit crimes of coercion by wrongful use of force or fear. Instead of challenging the perpetrators, Carr and his team of lawyers have colluded with them by indicting a victim.

Michael J. Finkle (a judge wannabe and lawyer employed by City of Seattle), in consort with Jeaneen Watkins (responsible for harassment and elder abuse complaints), has ignored legitimate Council House tenant complaints for several years. Watkins failed to follow City procedures for harassment complaints that would have shown the falsity of contentions by Stephen A. Mitchell.

If Watkins had followed procedures, then she would have found that Mitchell choreographed them in order to harass and intimidate the author to prevent him revealing a plethora of crimes that he and his directors have committed. Willfully accepting a false report and filing it with a law enforcement agency classifies as a serious criminal offense. [RCW 9A.76.175] [RCW 40.16.030]

City of Seattle lawyers and police have denied due process of law. Instead, they have colluded with Mitchell in a vicious vilification and blackmail campaign against elderly people who have reported crimes to government oversight authorities. They have consorted with Mitchell in recording myriad false reports and accepted false and misleading statements made to them at face value.

Council House has repeatedly not complied with Seattle Municipal Code to the detriment of elderly people. The directors have allowed Mitchell to incarcerate four tenants on trumped-up charges and have colluded in two cases of alleged homicide by abuse. City attorneys have willfully supported them in these unlawful practices. They continue to keep false and misleading reports as non-conviction data without processing them until they have a political use for them. Then, they file trumped-up criminal complaints using the fabricated reports as "evidence".
[Elder Abuse - Abstracts] [Homicide by Abuse]

Finkle claims: In accordance with RCW 42.17.260(1) and RCW 10.97.080, we are prohibited from providing you with a copy of non-conviction data, even though you are the subject of that non-conviction data.

Finkle willfully classifies manufactured records as non-conviction data. He does not process them according to municipal codes which afford accused persons an opportunity to refute the content. Carr and Council House directors use those documents, and false and misleading police reports, to either blackmail or indict dissenters and reporters.

Mitchell and his thugs boast publicly that they have dozens of similar reports ready to file if they do not succeed in obtaining convictions punishable by imprisonment. Mitchell also claims that if any judge finds against him the directors have the political power to reverse the decisions ex parte (behind the scenes).

Mitchell's filings form part of a retaliatory pattern or practice. He has filed similar complaints with federal agencies. They all smack of political expediency and blackmail. Officials have accepted at face value (and entered into evidence) false and misleading documents written by a hysterical, pathological liar. They then denied the subjects of those lies an opportunity to refute them. [Thespian Liar] [Histrionics and Narcissism]

Finkle has on file a Council House letter and supporting documentation that forms part of an official complaint. He will not allow the first party to have a copy of those documents or to respond to the accusations contained in them as required by municipal codes. US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and City of Seattle, the oversight authorities for Council House, regularly practice willful blindness and silently withhold these documents. HUD has similar letters on file. [Silent Withholding]

The author obtained copies of several letters from journalism sources that prove a pattern or practice of libel, manufactured evidence, and suborned or perjured testimony, designed to spawn malicious, criminal prosecution in kangaroo courts. Taxpayer funded agencies have refused to provide copies of documents under the Public Disclosure Act or FOIA in order to cover their tracks. [SM-01-1207-0000] [SM-00-0000-0000 - WIP]

A reasonable person reading the linked examples will interpret them as the rants of a mentally disturbed and subliterate individual who transfers his fantasies onto others. However, City officials have recorded that information and bring criminal charges if they think that they can get away with them. They defer to a mafia that employs Mitchell and his thugs to terrorize tenants and reporters to cover up its own criminal activity.

Finkle continues to stonewall public records requests under Washington Public Disclosure Act by using fatuous exemptions. For example, to a request for a copy of Watkin’s job description he replied:

After conducting a search of our records, we have determined that no document exists in our office that describes Ms. Watkins' job functions. [Emphasis added].

If he does not have a copy in his office, then he has a responsibility in law to refer the matter to the public records officer for his department. Anything less ranks as a manipulation of the statute. If Watkins does not have a written job description, then she cannot work for City of Seattle, let alone handle harassment complaints.

City of Seattle, Personnel Rule 2.1.1(G). “Classification specification” shall mean a written description of a classification . . . that includes a title, a description of distinguishing characteristics, a statement of typical duties and responsibilities, and a statement of minimum qualifications.

Carr, Finkle, and Hood have known for several years that Mitchell filed (and continues to file) false and misleading reports with government agencies yet have neglected to prosecute him. Instead, they have trumped-up more politically expedient criminal charges against the subject of his elder abuse. [SMC 12A.16.040]

These city officials apparently feed at the same trough with Judges Wartnik and Doerty and Council House directors. They have knowingly allowed a cover-up as part of the campaign of lies and deceit now contested on First Amendment grounds in a review by Washington Supreme Court. City officials have tried to preempt that decision in a municipal court by conspiring to bring fraudulent, frivolous, or capricious criminal charges based upon false and misleading reports by mobsters. They have participated in a major corruption scandal.

The public prosecutor received information relating to the death of Jackie Nations - the suicide that Mitchell mentions in his letter. The Jackie Nations abstract appeared in the elder abuse section of Contra Cabal more than twelve months ago. Carr also received a personal advice yet he made no attempt to investigate the alleged crimes. Instead, he has brought criminal charges against the informant for blowing the whistle about homicide! [Who Killed Jackie Nations?]

Officials must, by law, follow up reports of elder abuse and forward details to the public prosecutor. Appropriate authorities receive information upon publication of each Contra Cabal case study. Those officials must take action to insure that no more incidents occur yet they do nothing; instead, they cover up the crimes and harass the reporter.

Council House directors and their straws must accept responsibility for their dereliction and lack of response to complaints instead of consistently trying to kill the messenger. They have taken part in a kafkaesque charade to cover up elder abuse which involves criminal liability. Their neglect to act benefits the perpetrators. [Straw-Man Stratagem] [Kill the Messenger - WIP]

The letter that Mitchell wrote to Watkins typifies hundreds of other letters that Mitchell, Jacques his confederate, and Council House directors have sent to third parties (mainly government agencies and professional associates of tenants). The letters retaliated for filing complaints with government oversight authorities. Mitchell has for more than five years character assassinated tenants and blackmailed them into submission after they dissented or complained about elder abuse by his thugs. Three articles provide an insight into his psychological condition.
[Thespian Liar] [Histrionics and Narcissism] [Ravening Sociopath]

Any “surveillance” of Council House and its staff took place as part of thorough investigations of elder abuse using proven techniques and within journalism codes of conduct. Information in documented case studies, some already published, shows the falsity of what Mitchell has written and filed with government agencies.

Seattle City Attorney Thomas A. Carr received prepublication notices but neither acknowledged nor responded to them - a common practice in the mayor’s office. Consequently, the situation has deteriorated. Carr has used "evidence" scripted by a professional actor and acknowledged sociopath to orchestrate a convoluted scenario, then brought politically-motivated criminal charges against the person who reported the crime. Carr will need a team of attorneys and psychiatrists to unravel the convoluted legal problem that he has helped create with his attempts to give anonymous mobsters impunity. [Impunity]

[Nmesis]

Brad A. Meryhew, formerly Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons (SCRAP), a public defender appointed by Judge James A. Doerty when media pressure became too hot for him to handle, obtained the author’s release from solitary confinement (2002). Ironically, Meryhew succeeded without a purge of the alleged contempt that Doerty contrived in an ex parte relationship with Judge Anthony P. Wartnik. Meryhew, now in private practice as a partner in the Law Offices of James Newton, Auburn, Washington, will defend against the new criminal complaints filed in an alleged retaliatory compact among Thomas A. Carr, Seattle City Attorney, Council House directors, and lawyers exposed in Contra Cabal. Meryhew visited the author frequently while in jail and after transfer to solitary confinement. He inspired the author to undertake extensive research into institutionalized racism during and after his release. [Institutionalized Racism] [Attorneys at Law]